MENU
Text/HTML

BPS Blog

Welcome to the BPS Blog. Our blog provides the unique opportunity to share with the biophysics community worldwide BPS-related news, updates, and biophysics content. The interdisciplinary nature of biophysics provides the opportunity for biologists, physicists, chemists, bioengineers, and others to collaborate and push scientific discoveries. Check back often for the latest news and updates.  

BPS Networking Event in the Bluegrass State

[caption id="attachment_1171" align="alignright" width="300"] Kentucky biophysicists share their research during a poster session.[/caption] The Bluegrass Molecular Biophysics Networking Symposium was held at the University of Kentucky on Friday May 11, 2012. Over eighty biophysicists and other interested scientists attended. Participants were faculty, postdocs and students from ten universities located in Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, Tennessee, Missouri and Illinois, plus Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee. The symposium featured three plenary talks. Seth Robia (Loyola University, Chicago) discussed his work on calcium pumps in contracting cardiac muscle cells. Andrew Herr (University of Cincinnati) presented his work on proteins involved in zinc-induced intercellular adhesion in Staphyloccocal biofilms. Finally, Jason DeRouchey (University of Kentucky) presented work on DNA condensation, including the role of protamines in packaging DNA in sperm. There were also four short talks given by postdocs and students. These were selected from abstracts submitted for the poster session and were presented by Keita Uchida (Washington University, St. Louis), Amanda Siegel (Indiana University School of Medicine), Marina Malovichko (University of Louisville), and Adrianne Norris (University of Tennessee). The lunch and poster session, featuring 38 posters, provided participants time to discuss biophysics-related research in the region. This was also an excellent opportunity for participants to make connections with other scientists. The symposium concluded with two concurrent workshops. One on applying for jobs as a PI was led by Kenneth Campbell (University of Kentucky) and Seth Robia (Loyola University, Chicago). The second, on funding opportunities for biophysical science at the National Science Foundation, was led by David Rockcliffe, a Program Director in the BIO Directorate at the NSF. This symposium was funded by a BPS networking grant, plus support from the University of Kentucky’s Center for Structural Biology, Center for Muscle Biology, Office of the Vice-President for Research, and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. Many thanks to all who attended and to those who helped make the symposium a success. - Trevor Creamer, BPS Member
Previous Article A Participant's Perspective on the Congressional Visits
Next Article NIH Investigators Face Increased Scrutiny of Financial Conflicts of Interest
2181
Tags: Kentucky molecular biophysics

Related articles

1 comments on article "BPS Networking Event in the Bluegrass State"
Please login or register to post comments.

Search Blog

Blog Categories

Blog Calendar

«December 2024»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
2526272829301
2
12/2/2024
16249

Know the Editor

Each issue of BPS Bulletin highlights an editor from the Editorial Board of one of the BPS publications. For the December 2024 issue, we are highlighting Jianping Fu, an editor for Biophysical Journal.

Read more
3
12/3/2024
16277

Phonon Modes in Nanostructured Lipid Bilayers

In this collaboration between high-resolution inelastic X-ray scattering (IXS) and all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, we computed the phonon dispersions from both IXS spectroscopy and MD simulation for ternary mixtures of dioleoyl phosphocholine (DOPC)/dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC)/cholesterol (Chol) (an unsaturated lipid, a saturated lipid, and cholesterol) in both the liquid-ordered and liquid-disordered phases.

Read more
4
12/4/2024
16283

Birth, Evolution, and Death of Positively and Negatively Supercoiled Regions in Circular DNAs

DNA forms supercoiled regions in an otherwise relaxed state due to torsional strain that is generated because of the twisting of the DNA helix. The supercoiling is of two types: positive supercoiling, in which the DNA helix undergoes over-winding, and negative supercoiling, in which the DNA helix undergoes under-winding.

Read more
5678
91011
12/11/2024
16309

Engineering Stress as a Motivation for Filamentous Virus Morphology

In our research, we study the morphology and cellular interactions of viruses by using super-resolution fluorescence microscopy and advanced image analysis tools. We are interested in understanding why many viruses form particles that vary in size and shape, ranging from small spheres to long filamentous structures that can reach many microns in length, because this is not well understood.

Read more
12131415
1617
12/17/2024
16331

The Unique and Exotic Voltage-Gated Proton Channel

The cover image of the December 17 issue of Biophysical Journal was created by an irreproducible combination of drawing by hand, scanning, and editing with Paint.  I liked the result, because it was simple and reminded me of the “underground” artwork of Robert Crumb in Zap Comix published in the late 1960s. 

Read more
1819202122
23242526272829
303112345

Archive

Popular Tags

Latest Comments

SAHELI MITRA:

A must read.

Coronavirus Structure, Vaccine and Therapy Development
Brennan Weaver:

Pretty nice read. I wish I could have written something about Pi. It's my 2nd favorite number value. Also, I don't think Pi is as mysterious as everyone thinks it is. It's just a number with a lot of personalities. And I do believe there is a last digit.

Pi Is Encoded in the Patterns of Life
Harel Weinstein:

Just perused the article "From Dynamics to Membrane Organization- Experimental Breakthroughs Occasion a ‘‘Modeling Manifesto’’ in the August 21 issue. While the Perspective is intriguing, the sheer Chutzpah of writing a "manifesto" about a field of modeling with lists of "demands" based on experiments that in many cases are more limited in scope or reality than any physics-based model, is quite astounding. Neither artificial membrane slabs, nor "live cells" imaged under conditions in which cells have a shabby life that doesn't last long (how much of this is due to the mistreatment of the membrane proteins?) share established behaviors that must be matched or else.... No experiment, computational or using imaging, is meant to mimic reality, only to probe it based on models and assumptions that can be falsified.

As to the role of the cytoskeleton, what does this tell us about the membrane itself, or the behavior of membrane proteins as individual molecules in their interplay with the membrane? And since this unrelated scaffold differs greatly between cells, what is the "correct matching standard"? All models are wrong, some (computational, or on the stage of a microscope) are useful, but in my opinion, self-critical, humble, and rigorous scientific reasoning are preferable to a manifesto in order to foster progress.

In Search of…Protein Interaction Partners
Previous Next